There is a simple version of this and a complete version, and both are below in that order.

Short answer

Slow and reliable first, fast second — the reverse order costs more time than it saves.

Edge cases are genuinely rare, which is why the simple answer is usually the correct one. Doing something the slow way once teaches more than doing it the fast way ten times. It helps to understand why a step exists, because then you can adapt it when your situation is slightly different.

Doing it the reliable way

Advice that worked for someone else may have depended on something they never mentioned. If something feels harder than described, the difference is usually a missing prerequisite. Nothing below assumes you have read anything else first. The mechanic behind it is simpler than the discussion around it suggests.

Testing this yourself takes a few minutes and settles it definitively. The awkward part is rarely the step itself, it is knowing which step comes first. Trying the obvious thing first is underrated and costs almost nothing.

When the usual advice fails

A recommendation without a reason cannot be adapted when your situation differs. Where two approaches both work, the one with fewer moving parts is the one to keep. Knowing what to skip is worth as much as knowing what to do.

  • State your starting point before taking advice built for a different one.
  • Do it the slow way once.
  • Give a method one honest attempt before deciding it does not work.
  • Check the date on the top search result.
  • Look for a missing prerequisite when something feels too hard.

What to do next

It is worth separating what the game does from what players have concluded it does. Nothing here assumes a particular playstyle beyond wanting the thing to work. The first attempt should be about understanding the shape of the problem. There is a version of this that takes ten minutes and a version that takes an evening, and both are valid.

Anything that behaves differently on console than on PC is flagged where it matters. Nothing here depends on a setting you are unlikely to have. The accepted community answer is broadly right and wrong in a specific way that matters here.

Where to start

Treat anything stated without a version number as provisional. Most guides optimise for efficiency, which is not always what you want from a game. Small habits compound faster than any single technique.

If a step reads as obvious, do it anyway — the obvious ones are the ones people skip and then wonder about. The step people skip is the one that makes the rest work. The right approach depends on where you are, and most advice assumes a starting point it never states.

What to do instead

If your result differs from what is described here, note what is different first rather than starting over. Advice written for launch conditions is the most common source of confusion here. Consensus forms early and updates slowly, which is why the top result can be years stale.

Where people go wrong

  • Believing a figure that has no date attached to it.
  • Confusing a server-side outage with something broken locally.
  • Trusting a video thumbnail that promises a result the video never actually shows.

GTA V FAQ

Why do people disagree about this?

Mostly because they are describing different versions. Version drift explains the majority of contradictory advice about GTA 5.

Why does the community disagree about this?

Because most disagreements are two people describing different versions, platforms or skill levels without saying which.

Is there a faster way to do this?

Usually, and it usually trades reliability for speed. Which one you want depends on whether you plan to repeat it.

Is this still accurate after the latest GTA 5 update?

The method is; individual numbers may not be. If a value on your screen differs, trust the screen and keep the sequence.

That is the whole of it — if something here stops matching GTA 5, the game changed, not the method.